Knowledge：HECC Certification for Hockey Cut-Resistant Neck Guard Shirts

1. Overview

The Hockey Equipment Certification Council (HECC) is an independent certification organization for hockey protective equipment. HECC certification is particularly important for products intended for hockey players in the United States, where organizations such as USA Hockey, NFHS, and NCAA require or recognize HECC-certified equipment for applicable product categories.

For neck laceration protection, HECC has established a specific Neck Laceration Protector Certification Program. The current certification pathway is based on the applicable ISO requirements, with CSA Group acting as the current HECC validator for this program.

The current applicable standard identified by CSA for neck laceration protectors is:

ISO 10256-1:2024 – Protective equipment for use in ice hockey — Part 1: General requirements
ISO 10256-5:2026 – Protective equipment for use in ice hockey — Part 5: Neck laceration protectors for use in ice hockey

2. What Is a Hockey Cut-Resistant Neck Guard Shirt?

A hockey cut-resistant neck guard shirt is a garment designed to reduce the risk of laceration injuries caused by hockey skate blades, particularly around the neck area.

Depending on the product construction, the garment may include:

Cut-resistant neck protection
Cut-resistant bib/chest protection
Cut-resistant sleeves
Cut-resistant torso areas
Integrated neck protection
A high-neck design
Different levels or areas of cut-resistant material

From a certification perspective, it is important to distinguish between:

A. Stand-Alone Neck Laceration Protector

A separate neck guard worn independently from the hockey jersey or base-layer shirt.

B. Apparel-Integrated Neck Laceration Protector

A neck protector integrated into a garment, such as a cut-resistant shirt or base layer.

The CSA certification application form specifically asks applicants to identify whether the NLP construction is “Stand Alone” or “Apparel Integrated.”

3. Does a Neck Guard Shirt Need HECC Certification?

The answer depends on the intended product scope and market.

If the product is intended to be marketed as a neck laceration protector for ice hockey, and especially if it is intended for the U.S. hockey market, HECC certification should be considered a key certification requirement.

However, a complete long-sleeve cut-resistant shirt should not automatically be assumed to be fully covered by the HECC Neck Laceration Protector certification program.

The manufacturer should first confirm with CSA/HECC that the specific product construction and intended protective areas fall within the certification scope.

This is particularly important for garments in which cut-resistant protection extends beyond the neck and bib areas.

4. CSA and HECC – What Is the Difference?

CSA and HECC have different roles.

CSA Group

CSA Group is the certification/testing organization currently acting as the validator for the HECC Neck Laceration Protector Certification Program.

CSA may review:

Product construction
Engineering drawings
Materials
Cut-resistant layers
Test reports
Product sizes
Markings
User instructions
Compliance with the applicable ISO standards

HECC

HECC is the hockey equipment certification organization.

The HECC certification provides recognition that the applicable hockey protective equipment has successfully completed the required certification process.

Therefore, the practical certification pathway can be understood as:

Manufacturer → CSA technical review/testing → Compliance with applicable ISO requirements → HECC certification

5. Current Standards

The current CSA application form for Neck Laceration Protectors identifies:

ISO 10256-1:2024

This is the general requirements standard for protective equipment used in ice hockey.

The CSA application specifically requires an attestation letter confirming compliance with ISO 10256-1:2024, Clause 4.2.1.

ISO 10256-5:2026

This is the specific standard for:

Neck laceration protectors for use in ice hockey.

The 2026 edition contains requirements relating to areas such as:

Types of neck laceration protectors
Ergonomics
Innocuousness
Protected area
Protector stability and recovery
Cut resistance
Markings
User information

The current published 2026 edition should be used for certification planning rather than relying on an earlier ISO/DIS draft.

6. Product Classification

During the CSA application process, the manufacturer is expected to provide detailed product information.

Important information includes:

Product Model

For example:

Model: XYZ-100

Intended User

For example:

Adult
Women
Youth
Junior

Construction

The manufacturer must identify whether the product is:

Stand Alone
Apparel Integrated

Intended Neck Circumference

The application requires the intended neck circumference range in centimeters.

The application also identifies three neck-size categories:

Small: less than 30 cm
Medium: 30 cm to 40 cm
Large: greater than 40 cm

NLP Type

The CSA application identifies:

E1 – with cut-resistant bib

E2 – without cut-resistant bib

The correct classification should be determined from the actual product construction.

7. Material and Construction Information

CSA requires detailed information about the protective material construction.

For each layer, the manufacturer may need to provide:

Layer position
Material name
Material type / compound / chemical name
Weight per square meter (g/m²)
Raw material thickness (mm)
Material manufacturer

The layers should be identified from the inside to the outside of the protector.

If the product contains more than four layers, additional rows should be provided.

For an E1 protector, if the neck and bib constructions are different, the neck area and bib area need to be documented separately.

8. Engineering Drawings

Engineering drawings are an important part of the certification application.

The drawings should clearly identify, where applicable:

Overall product dimensions
Neck opening
Neck protection area
Bib dimensions
Protective material locations
Seams
Stitching
Closures
Overlaps
Layer construction
Size information
Areas containing cut-resistant material

For apparel-integrated products, it is particularly important to show how the neck protector is permanently or functionally integrated into the garment.

9. Cut-Resistance Testing

Cut resistance is one of the most important technical aspects of the certification.

The certification body may need to verify:

Cut-resistant material performance
Protective layer construction
Material thickness
Product construction
Test sample preparation
Applicable test method
Performance of the finished protector rather than only the raw material

A manufacturer should therefore not assume that a raw-material cut-resistance test report automatically proves compliance of the finished garment.

CSA should confirm which existing reports can be accepted and which additional testing is required.

10. Stability and Recovery

One important area in the current ISO 10256-5 framework is protector stability and recovery.

This addresses the ability of the protector to maintain its intended protective position and recover appropriately after deformation or movement.

This is particularly relevant to an apparel-integrated neck protector because the neck protection must remain correctly positioned during hockey activities.

Existing test data from an older certification standard should therefore be reviewed against the current ISO 10256-5:2026 requirements.

11. Existing BNQ Certification

If the manufacturer already has a valid BNQ certification for the same or substantially equivalent neck protector, this certification can be very valuable during the CSA/HECC application.

For example, an existing certificate may demonstrate that the product has previously undergone third-party evaluation under:

CAN/BNQ 9415-370/2007 – Neck Protectors for Ice Hockey and Ringette Players

However, an older BNQ certificate does not automatically demonstrate compliance with every requirement of ISO 10256-5:2026.

The recommended approach is therefore:

Existing BNQ certificate + original BNQ test reports → CSA technical review → Gap assessment → Additional testing if required → HECC certification

This approach may avoid unnecessary duplication of testing.

12. Documents Normally Required for the CSA Application

A manufacturer should prepare a technical package containing, as applicable:

Product Information

Product model numbers
Product photographs
Product descriptions
Size range
Intended neck circumference
Product classification
Stand-alone or apparel-integrated status
E1/E2 classification

Technical Information

Engineering drawings
Bill of Materials (BOM)
Material specifications
Layer construction
Material manufacturer information
Cut-resistant material specifications
Existing test reports
Existing certification documents

Certification Documents

Existing BNQ certificates
Existing laboratory reports
ISO compliance documentation
ISO 10256-1:2024 Clause 4.2.1 attestation letter
User instructions
Product labels
Packaging artwork
Marking information

13. CSA/HECC Certification Process

A practical certification process can generally be organized as follows:

Step 1 – Define the Product Scope

Determine whether the product is:

Stand-alone neck protector
Apparel-integrated neck protector
Neck protector with bib
Full cut-resistant hockey shirt

Step 2 – Submit the Technical Information

Provide CSA with:

Product description
Drawings
BOM
Materials
Existing certificates
Existing test reports
User instructions

Step 3 – CSA Technical Review

CSA reviews the existing documentation and determines:

Which requirements are already demonstrated
Which existing test reports may be accepted
Which requirements require additional evidence
Which tests must be performed on new samples

Step 4 – Receive Quotation

CSA provides the applicable quotation and certification/testing scope.

Samples should generally not be submitted before the quotation is accepted, as instructed on the CSA application form.

Step 5 – Submit Samples

After the quotation and scope are accepted, CSA will specify the required samples, sizes and quantities.

Step 6 – Testing

Additional testing is performed where required.

Step 7 – Corrective Action

If any requirement is not met, the manufacturer may need to:

Modify the product
Modify materials
Modify construction
Modify labeling
Submit revised samples
Conduct additional testing

Step 8 – Certification

Once all applicable requirements are satisfied, the CSA/HECC certification process can proceed.

14. Canada vs. United States Market

For a Canadian brand selling a hockey cut-resistant neck guard shirt in both Canada and the United States, the certification strategy should be planned around both markets.

Canadian Market

The manufacturer should determine the certification and regulatory requirements applicable to its intended Canadian market and customers.

Existing Canadian certification, such as BNQ certification, can be useful depending on the product and market requirements.

United States Market

HECC certification is particularly important for applicable hockey equipment intended for organizations and leagues that require HECC-certified equipment.

This includes organizations such as:

USA Hockey
NFHS
NCAA

Therefore, for a Canadian brand planning to sell the same product in both Canada and the U.S., a CSA/HECC certification pathway may be more commercially useful than pursuing only a Canadian certification.

15. Important Certification Question for Cut-Resistant Shirts

Before starting testing, the manufacturer should ask CSA/HECC the following question in writing:

“Does our long-sleeve hockey cut-resistant neck guard shirt, including its integrated neck protection and additional cut-resistant garment areas, fall within the current HECC Neck Laceration Protector Certification Program under ISO 10256-1:2024 and ISO 10256-5:2026?”

If the answer is yes, the next question should be:

“Which portions of the garment are included within the HECC certification scope, and which portions, if any, require evaluation under a separate cut-resistant clothing standard or certification program?”

This written confirmation is especially important for products that provide cut resistance over the neck, chest, arms and torso.

16. Recommended Strategy for a Canadian Brand

For a Canadian brand developing a hockey cut-resistant neck guard shirt for both Canada and the U.S., the recommended strategy is:

1. Confirm product scope with CSA/HECC

↓

2. Classify the product as Stand Alone or Apparel Integrated

↓

3. Determine E1 or E2 classification

↓

4. Identify all cut-resistant layers

↓

5. Collect existing laboratory and certification reports

↓

6. Compare existing evidence against ISO 10256-1:2024 and ISO 10256-5:2026

↓

7. Ask CSA to perform a gap assessment

↓

8. Complete only the additional testing required

↓

9. Complete CSA certification requirements

↓

10. Complete HECC certification/listing requirements

This is generally more efficient than starting a completely new certification program without first evaluating existing evidence.

17. Key Takeaway

For a Hockey Cut-Resistant Neck Guard Shirt, the most important question is not simply:

“Do we need CSA or HECC?”

The more appropriate question is:

“Does the complete product fall within the HECC Neck Laceration Protector certification scope, and can CSA validate it under ISO 10256-1:2024 and ISO 10256-5:2026?”

The manufacturer should obtain written confirmation from CSA before committing to a complete testing program, particularly when the neck protector is integrated into a long-sleeve cut-resistant shirt.